Michele Merisi da Caravaggio was an influential Italian artist from the mid 16th century. His works are often filled with drama and violence which are amplified by his chiaro-scuro application of paint. Although his personal life isn't fully documented, by what little remains it can be ascertained he was a troubled man.
Critique Guidelines
1. Use the Elements of Art and Design as the basis to analyze the work of art constructively.
2. Respond to the work of art using full sentences and using academic vocabulary.
3. If available or knowable, reference other artists or works of art.
4. This is an academic thread, compliments are welcome but DO NOT TURN THIS ONTO A SOCIAL BLOG.
2. Respond to the work of art using full sentences and using academic vocabulary.
3. If available or knowable, reference other artists or works of art.
4. This is an academic thread, compliments are welcome but DO NOT TURN THIS ONTO A SOCIAL BLOG.
Instructions
Download and thoroughly read the following thesis by Veronica Polinedrio (2012) from the University of Kentucky
Then watch the following film about the life of Caravaggio by Simon Schama. https://youtu.be/VXlGcH4gvFI Develop a persuasive critique to support or negate Caravaggio's self-depiction in his work David with the Head of Goliath (1610). Remember to quote the provided material to support your argument. What are the contentions at hand? Do any events in his life support his choice or are relevant to his choices? Your first post must at least be 10 sentences long and you must also coherently respond to three other members to receive full credit. | |